News Release
For Immediate Release
Contact: Beth Gorman (520) 740-3343
Tucson, Arizona (November 6, 2006) – According
to air pollution monitoring data from Pima County Department
of Environmental Quality, levels of one major air pollutant were
up slightly while the other major air pollutant levels were down.
There were more days during the summer of 2006 categorized as “moderate” air
quality days and fewer days in the “good” categories
for ozone compared with 2005, but “good” days for
particulate matter increased.
Out of 183 days from April through September 2006, 50 days were
in the “moderate” range for ground-level ozone compared
with 41 “moderate” days in 2005. However, there were
no unhealthy days for ozone in 2006 compared with one “unhealthy
for sensitive individuals” day in 2005. In addition, the
highest Air Quality Index (AQI) ozone reading in 2006 (97) was
lower than the 2005 maximum reading (106). “Ground-level
ozone is a very complicated pollutant and is strongly influenced
by meteorological conditions, as well as emissions from motor
vehicles and other sources,” said Beth Gorman, Program
Manager for Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. “During
the summer of 2006, we saw fewer good air days, but we didn’t
see any unhealthy days which is an improvement when compared
with the summer before,” she said. “On average, our
ozone levels are running at about 10 percent below the U.S. EPA
health standard, which is a small cushion of safety,” Gorman
continued. Ground-level ozone is created when nitrogen oxides,
typically from automobile emissions, combine with volatile organic
compounds, such as solvents and gasoline fumes, in the presence
of the sun’s energy. This air pollutant that forms at ground-level
is not to be confused with the ozone layer which occurs naturally
in the upper atmosphere and protects us from damaging solar radiation.
The AQI uses a formula to translate the pollutant concentration
into an index value from 1 to 500, where 1-50 is good, 51-100
is moderate, and over 100 is considered various stages of “unhealthy” all
the way to “hazardous” at 500.
The AQI levels for particulate matter were lower during the
summer of 2006 than during the previous summer. This more visible
pollutant is comprised of microscopic particles generated from
numerous
sources including diesel soot, vehicle emissions, road dust from
traffic, unpaved roads, industrial emissions, wood smoke, construction
activities, farming, and wind-blown soil.
PDEQ recorded 168 “good” days for particulate matter
during the summer of 2006 compared with 150 in 2005. As with
2005, no days were considered “unhealthy” for particulate
matter during the summer of 2005. “We can have elevated
levels of particulate matter any time of year, especially when
it is dry and windy,” said Wayne Byrd, Manager of the air
quality monitoring network at PDEQ. “The abundant summer
rains contributed to the reduction in particulate matter in our
air and hopefully, the winter rains will come this year and help
to keep airborne dust down,” Byrd continued. The Pima County
area violated the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) health
standards for particulate matter that is 10 microns or less in
diameter in 1999. PDEQ is addressing this violation through the
Natural Events Action Plan (NEAP) to reduce particulate emissions.
The Pima County Board of Supervisors adopted stricter dust control
regulations in December 2002.
Changes in levels of solar radiation in the fall and winter
months reduce the potential for ozone pollution, but winter weather
conditions can increase levels of carbon monoxide. Elevated levels
of carbon monoxide (CO) can occur in the winter, when stagnant
weather conditions, coupled with reduced engine efficiency associated
with cold temperatures, cause higher levels of CO. Other sources
of CO include wood fires, barbeques, and gasoline lawn and garden
equipment. After being designated as non-attainment of the EPA
health standards for violations occurring in the 1970s and early
1980s, Pima County was redesignated by EPA as a CO maintenance
area in the spring of 1999. Two seasonal CO monitoring sites
have been set up for the winter CO season at Cherry/Glenn and
Kolb/Golf Links to augment PDEQ’s four full-time CO sites.
In addition, one mobile solar CO monitoring site will be deployed
this winter to monitor CO levels at three “hot-spot” intersections
for 30 days at each location. The first hotspot site is at Speedway
and Swan.
PDEQ is Air Quality Control District and, as such, is the agency
responsible for ambient air monitoring in Pima County. The department
monitors five different air pollutants at numerous sites around
the county. Site-specific air pollution information can be obtained
by calling (520) 882-4AIR or by visiting the PDEQ website at
www.AirInfoNow.org.
Air Quality Index Readings
April 1 – September 30
2006 |
Ozone |
PM10 |
# of Good days |
133 |
168 |
# of Moderate days |
50 |
15 |
# of Unhealthy FSG* |
0 |
0 |
Max AQI Reading** |
97 |
72 |
2005 |
Ozone |
PM10 |
# of Good days |
141 |
150 |
# of Moderate days |
41 |
33 |
# of Unhealthy FSG* |
1 |
0 |
Max AQI Reading** |
106 |
66 |
2004 |
Ozone |
PM10 |
# of Good days |
133 |
177 |
# of Moderate days |
50 |
6 |
# of Unhealthy FSG* |
0 |
0 |
Max AQI Reading** |
79 |
83 |
2003 |
Ozone |
PM10 |
# of Good days |
133 |
177 |
# of Moderate days |
50 |
6 |
# of Unhealthy FSG* |
0 |
0 |
Max AQI Reading** |
79 |
83 |
*Unhealthy For Sensitive Groups
**Maximum Air Quality Index Values
0 to 50 |
Good |
No health effects are expected. |
51 to 100 |
Moderate |
Individuals may experience respiratory effects from prolonged
outdoor exertion if they are unusually sensitive. |
101 to 150 |
Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups |
Members of sensitive groups may experience respiratory
symptoms (coughing, pains when taking a deep breath). |
151 to 200 |
Unhealthy |
Members of sensitive groups have higher chance of experiencing
respiratory symptoms (aggravated cough or pain), and reduces
lung function. Everyone else should limit prolonged exertion. |
201 to 300 |
Very Unhealthy |
Members of sensitive groups experience increasingly severe
respiratory symptoms and impaired breathing and should avoid
any outdoor activity. Everyone else should limit prolonged
exertion. |
301 to 500 |
Hazardous |
Warnings at this level trigger emergency conditions. The
entire population is likely to be affected. |
Health Effects of Particulate Matter
When inhaled, particulate matter invades the respiratory system’s
natural defenses and lodges deep in the bronchial tubes. Health
effects of particulate matter include:
• Premature mortality;
• Chronic respiratory disease;
• Aggravated asthma;
• Acute respiratory symptoms;
• Decreased lung function;
• Reduction in the body’s ability to fight infections.
• 36% increase in death from lung cancer;
• 26% increase in cardiopulmonary deaths;
• Significant increase in hospital and doctors visits;
medication use;
• Increase in bronchitis, chronic cough, and respiratory
symptoms in persons with COPD; and
• Increase in wheezing and shortness of breath
• Increase in cardio-respiratory mortality and morbidity
even when PM is below federal standard
Health Effects of Carbon
Monoxide
Carbon monoxide enters the bloodstream and reduces oxygen delivery
to the body's organs and tissues. The health threat from exposure
to CO is most serious for those who suffer from cardiovascular
disease. Depending on the concentration level, health effects
of CO include:
• Visual impairment;
• Reduced work capacity;
• Reduced manual dexterity;
• Poor learning ability difficulty in performing complex
tasks;
• Fatigue in healthy people;
• Chest pain in people with heart disease;
• Headaches;
• Dizziness;
• Confusion;
• Nausea;
• Flu-like symptoms that clear up after leaving area
with elevated CO; and
• Death.
###